« Off Target | Main | Too Crazy? Or Too Pretty? »

“Is Narnia a place of Christian faith or a place to get away from it?”

The Lion, the Witch and the WardrobeI loved the Chronicles of Narnia when I was a kid. If memory serves, the last time I read my family’s copy of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, the book had to be held together with a rubber band because pages were falling out.

Christianity did not factor much in my upbringing. I had nothing in particular against Jesus or God, but what little I knew about Christian belief and practice just seemed kind of creepy and weird. That the only obviously religious person in my family, my great-grandmother, was a maudlin alcoholic with a pronounced mean streak and a naïve, desperate faith only reinforced my childhood views. I mention all this by way of pointing out that, when my parents recommended the Narnia books, they recommended them as fantasy, not as Christian allegory.

By the time I understood that some folks read C.S. Lewis’s fiction as Bible stories my childhood fear of religion had turned into curiosity: I was a religion major concentrating in New Testament studies. I knew a great deal about Christianity at this point, enough to know, for instance, that Aslan makes for a truly crappy Christ figure. Jesus was the suffering servant, the sacrificial lamb. He was not lord of the jungle. I was also struck by how very odd it is to include fauns and Silenus and such in a Christian fable. And I recalled how very much I didn’t enjoy The Last Battle when I was a kid; its apocalyptic existentialism and eternal ending really freaked me out, just like imagining nuclear war or trying to envision heaven freaked me out. This is to say that, from my perspective, the Lewis’s novels were least successful when they were most Christian.

I’ve been thinking about all of this as I’ve watched the progress of The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe: The Movie, which is, it seems, an effort on the part of Disney to make up for all the dollars they lost when they passed on The Lord of the Rings, and to tap into the “Christian” audience—that is, all the people who paid to see The Passion of the Christ and who have made the Left Behind books bestsellers. And Walden Media—Disney’s partner in the project—is an explicitly evangelical entertainment company.

Given that the Christian apologists seem to have won Narnia for now, Adam Gopnik’s recent New Yorker piece on Lewis is a provocative reassessment of the situation. It’s also a lovely piece of criticism, and it introduced me to Lewis’s apparently quite brilliant scholarly work on the interplay of religion and imagination in art. Really, it’s one of the best things I’ve read in awhile.

November 22, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d426c53ef00d834c476d469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference “Is Narnia a place of Christian faith or a place to get away from it?”:

Comments

Jessica,
I just read your post on Narnia/Lewis/Gopnik. I share some of your views about the media taking over the story for market share, etc...
If you have time, check out my post on these same topics at www.anagnosticchristian.com.
-Lee S.

Posted by: lee stagg | Nov 23, 2005 7:09:31 AM

me likey, too. the article. my feeling on the question of whether or not the narnia books are christian is that they kind of are and kind of arent at the same time. christ, when he first arrived in europe, was often depicted as a king, having been appropriated by odin-worshippers and all. also, i, unlike gopnik, like lewis' christian writing. he didnt mention my favorite lewis christian book, *the great divorce.*

--tia

Posted by: tia | Nov 23, 2005 11:33:10 AM

well, tia, my fellow religion-major, you are right about christ the king. protestants, in particular, seem to like the triumphant, fist-pumping jesus. i guess i was betraying my own preference for the disenfranchised jesus.

xoxox,
jessica

Posted by: jessica | Nov 24, 2005 9:48:04 AM

Wow, this is an excellent article--I'll have to read it more than once. Some things I agree with and others I disagree with, but I like his notion of Narnia as a place where "the atheist and the believer meet". FWIW, I guess I've never seen Christianity as a framework to fit Narnia into; rather, Narnia is a part of the framework into which I fit my religion. Something like that, anyway.

I would love to read Gopnik on Tolkien.

Posted by: Mike | Nov 25, 2005 11:55:14 PM

Lewis routinely rejected the idea that Aslan = Christ. Nevertheless, when a parent wrote him worrying that her son was substituting Aslan for Jesus in his prayers, Lewis (who made a great effort to reply to all letters) wrote that this was not blasphemy, and not even a problem. Eventually, Lewis wrote, the child would grow out of this, but until then Aslan would work just fine for the boy's prayers.

One of Christianity's defining, and most troublesome, charteristics is Christ's mutability. He is portrayed not only as a suffering servant, but as a conquerer and lord. In Revelation, he is both the lamb on the throne and a seemingly contradictory slayer on a white horse.

One of Lewis' greatest achievements with Aslan is that I think he shares in this dichotomy. Aslan is not a tame lion, but Lewis writes him also as a placid, playful lamb.

As far as the faun and magic, it is a bit contradictory to hear evangelicals deride Harry Potter and praise Narnia in the same breath, for the same thing. But as far as Lewis is concerned, he did not have forty years of evangelicals protesting "magic" and witches and the occult. Moreover, Lewis' proto-evangelicalism is arguable at best.

Posted by: John Beeler | Nov 29, 2005 12:42:08 AM

Post a comment